Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, April 29th 2010

Electric cars, not as green as you might think, oddly.

Green gone wild, residents in the UK are told to sort their trash into nine separate bins. In Canada, we sort the trash then haul it huge distances in carbon-spewing trucks. Penn & Teller were right.

The IPCC has another error, the disappearing Bangladesh coast, isn’t. More on the mangrove mishaps here.

Shockah! A green technology being sold to homeowners with greatly exaggerated claims of its efficiency? Why is this a problem when the lies are told to homeowners, but not to entire populations?

Oh noes, Arctic exploration is threatened. By cooling. Awkward. Also, why is it only warmists who need rescuing from themselves?

Dude, where’s the O2?

Isn’t calling Carbon Dioxide “Carbon” like calling water “Hydrogen”? Actually its worse then that, water is 2/3 Hydrogen, CO2 is only 1/3 Carbon. What Happened to the Oxygen molecules? Where’s the “Dioxide”?

One sure sign of a warming planet is when Napa wine growers need to spend a fortune on frost control in April. Wait, what?

Ethics, smethics. Obama appointed Assistant Secretary of Energy Cathy Zoi, and it turns out that she is a person well placed to help herself and Al Gore:

…disclosure documents show that Zoi not only is in a position to affect the fortunes of her previous employer, ex-Vice President Al Gore, but that she herself has large holdings in two firms that could directly profit from policies proposed by the Department of Energy.

Carbon capture, a moonbat pipedream, suffered a huge blow when it was discovered that the space required for such projects had been greatly underestimated. Which is awkward, because computer models were used to predict the space needed. Computer can be models mistaken? Say it ain’t so.

But it is - Source code is the source of global warming hysteria:

It seems the approach of the Apostles of Global Warming is what many of us have suspected for years: where there is no data, make it up; where there is contradictory data, massage it out or ignore it; if the data happens to fit the hypothesis, by all means use it.

CO2 is not pollution, explained.

Urban Heat Island effect, it’s real. UHI is the only warming that scaremongers consistently dismiss, apart from the medieval warming period and any other inconvenient truths that prove their claims are pure hoax.

Evil climate delayers have doomed Australian children and grandchildren to a dry, ghastly death by killing off the ETS. Oh, wait, the government killed it? Unpopular, you say? In an election year? But, wasn’t global warming “the great moral and economic challenge of our time“?

NASA went wobbly on the certainty of global warming. Perhaps it was that new computer?

Page 5 of 7 | Previous page | Next page